Ace the RMA Challenge 2025 – Rock Your Registered Medical Assistant Journey!

The correct perspective that upholds fiduciary responsibility in a special relationship is the virtues argument. This perspective emphasizes the importance of moral character and the inherent qualities that individuals should embody within their relationships. A fiduciary relationship often entails a trust and reliance on one party to act in the best interest of another, such as in a provider-patient or trustee-beneficiary setting.

The virtues argument centers around the idea of being a moral agent, which includes values like honesty, integrity, and loyalty. In fiduciary contexts, these virtues are critical because they help ensure that the fiduciary acts with the other party’s welfare in mind. By embodying these virtues, a fiduciary acknowledges their responsibility and commitment to prioritize the needs and interests of those they serve.

In contrast, the other perspectives focus more on rules, rights, or outcomes rather than character. The deontological perspective is based on adherence to rules or duties, the ethics argument focuses on the broader ethical frameworks, and the rights argument emphasizes the individual rights of parties involved. While these perspectives may inform fiduciary responsibilities, the virtues argument specifically addresses the character traits necessary to fulfill those responsibilities effectively in special relationships.